State Constitution and United States Constitution

State Constitution and United States Constitution: Similarities and Differences
The California constitution ranks among the longest drafts and consists of amendments that influence reforms. Detailed information on constitutional provisions and clauses makes it long. Words written in the Californian constitution express legal stipulations clearly and pass information about their individual rights. Legal clauses mentioned in this constitution provide citizens with information about their freedoms and rule of law.
The heading Article 1: Declaration of Rights provides background information on laws applied in the California constitution (California, 2000). Under Article 1, 31 sections offer guidance on broad legal issues. From section 1-31, the constitution explores information about liberties, individual rights and public expectations. Topics such as information access, transparent government services and military rules express legal stipulations surrounding stakeholders. Each section comes under the sub-heading of declaration of rights and informs about different clauses applicable to individuals.
The U.S constitution adopts a federal based structure compared to California constitution that provides state laws applicable to the region. The U.S constitution maps out federal systems and roles concerning implementation of constitutional provisions. There is no detailed information in the U.S constitution because laws explore basic structures of federal operations. Power-based considerations exist in the U.S constitution thereby creating limitations compared to state constitutions.
The government of California adopts a three-branch system of governance similar to the U.S constitution. For example, executive, legislative and judiciary influences government system in the state of California. The same applies to the U.S government that operates the three branches to oversee its mandates (Finkelman, 2006). The difference comes to congress and California has a state assembly thereby differs from the U.S government structure. Senators and state assembly comprise the legislative section of government compared to the Congress in the U.S government.
State Constitution and Bill of Rights
Property protection and individual liberties represent some rights entrenched in the California Bill of Rights (Grodin 2017). For example, the declaration stipulates asset ownership and criterion individuals should utilize in accordance with the law. Citizens have rights to living a better life and empower them to defend values in their lives.
Rights mentioned in the California constitution share similar attributes to the U.S constitution such as freedom, democracy and right to better life. Both California and U.S constitutions explore human rights and protect the interests of individual Americans regardless of their differences. The main difference between rights comes to detailed specifications as seen in California constitution compared to U.S constitution.
Specific Right to Privacy
The specific right to privacy does not prevail in the California constitution and encompasses broad provisions on privacy. The specific right to privacy matters because of protecting citizen rights and advancing their interests. Consumer right to financial privacy is one clause mentioned in California constitution and allows individuals to access information devoid of third party influence. Consumers according to courts in California should access their personal information without intimidation from individuals or organizations concerning exposure. The consumer right to financial information privacy is broad compared to the U.S constitution privacy clause that comes under power limitations.
Explicit Versus General Constitutional Language and Protection of Rights
The general constitutional language is preferred compared to explicit because of addressing public interests. Lawmakers claim that explicit constitutional language hampers provisions in the protection of rights because of miscommunication with the public domain. The language in California constitution utilizes basic language understood by masses and provides details concerning various rights such as privacy and economic freedom. Contrary, the U.S constitution adopts vague language characterized by few descriptions. Constitutional writers did this with the intention of allowing regular adjustments based on circumstances. The U.S constitution has legal limits and hence does not offer detailed analysis of legal statues. The language used in California constitution is clear because of serving the interests of this state and hence stipulates necessary provisions. A good example is declaration of rights that spells out various legal measures under each section.